So my employer has offered us our new rates and I was thinking that many people actually are probably dealing with this right now or will be in the future(or maybe just have dealt with this). Open enrollment is often in December, and I know this is late in the month but after doing some math I came to the realization that either I am getting swindled, or I am an idiot at math(doubt that).
So heres the deal.
Cheapo individual rate insurace plan overview;
-5k deductible in network/10k out of network
-100% co-insurance after that
-$35/copay for visit in network, $50 for out of network
-$5/$15/$35 on prescriptions
Since plan covers 100% after deductible, no max out of pocket is applicable. Just pay the deductible and you are done. Plan costs $38.19/bi weekly and is offered as the cheap ass plan. All other coverages are identical between the two plans. Even Hospital visits, maternity coverage, wambulance rides and all. Everything. The differences in the two plans I want to talk about will be obvious with what I post. I have verified this as it is applicable to MY plan and will be using this information for the mathematic purposes of my post.
Premo plan individual rate plan overview;
-1k deductible in network/2k out of network
-80/20 co-insurance, you pay 20% after the deductible if in network. 60/40 out of network.
-$20 copay in network, $35 out of network
-$5/$10/$20 prescriptions
-10k max out of pocket in network(applicable to co-insurance) 20k out of network.
Plan cost is $139.08 bi-weekly. Keep in mind, all other details line by line are identical.
So, in my hypothetical-scenario-of-a-brain-thinking-way(I cannot help this, it is my curse), I started doing the math and thinking of some outcomes that made me think the cheaper insurance was actually better. There are some assumptions here, like assuming you actually ended up using medical providers in your network-just as an example.
So lets say you have 1 accident that costs 10k over the span of 1 year but you avoid going to the doctor for anything else. For mathematic purposes and ease of explaining, I'll keep the details simple.
In that year you would pay on the cheap-o plan;
-Your premiums($38.19*26 paychecks = $992.94)
-Your deductible(5k)
So $992.94 in premiums and 5k deductible or $5,992.94 total. If you were in an ambulance or had to go to the ER, the coverage is the same so the outcome would be the same either way. You may have to pay a co-pay for an initial visit, depending on the emergency. This difference would be less than $50 depending on what and where you were, so, I'll leave this cost out.
In the same year, if you had the prem-o plan you would pay;
-Your premiums($139.08*26 paychecks = $3,616.08)
-Your deductible(1k)
-20% of the bill or your portion of the co-insurance(10k bill - 1k deductible = 9k. 20% of 9k=$1800)
So, $3616.08 in premiums, 1k for the deductible and $1800 for the co-insurance or $6,416.08 total.
If you do the math, over and over and over, it seems like once you break the 8k benchmark, you actually end up better off with the cheap ass insurance.
Difference? Most of the money spent on the prem-o plan is in premiums. But, you might not need the insurance. You most likely won't have an accident that costs 10k or more, and if you do, hospitals and doctors are generally very flexible with taking payments. You are paying for the "coverage" either way with a premium plan, you only pay for it if you use it for the cheap ass plan.
So I guess I don't really get it. The devil is always hiding in the details, but I wonder just how often people are getting screwed around in stuff like this and they don't even know it.
The costs are similar, less than 15% in cost difference in the example I gave if something should actually happen. However, the premiums are 400% higher for the "better" plan and its entirely possible you won't even go to the doctor for anything serious this year. I mean, it could happen but if you do the math on a 25k or 50k hospital bill, the picture doesn't get any prettier with "premo" coverage.
Cost associated with 50k accident for either plan
Cheap ass plan
-$992.94 in premiums
-5k deductible
$5,992.94 total since you are 100% covered after 5k. No co-insurance on this plan because the deductible is "so high" as my HR person explained.
Premo plan
-$3,616.08 in premiums
-1k deductible
-20% co-insurance. 20% of 49k is $9,800, just under the out of pocket max. (I subtracted the 1k deductible that you pay 100% of)
So, $3,616.08 in premiums, 1k deductible and $9,800 in "shared costs" and you are looking at $14,416.08 that you owe over a 50k medical emergency with a "premo" plan.
Thoughts?
My thoughts are that the insurance plans are written to intimidate people into feeling like "OMG 5k deductibles what ever shall i do" and so they just instinctually sign up for the "more affordable, better inurance". Or so they think because of how it is presented to them. Insurance companies make money off of premiums, not claims. So, it sure seems like the appearance of the plan is supposed to be a better plan, but when you start doing the math it actually seems to be working against you to have "better" insurance. Its like they assume nobody has 5k to pay a bill, so they hold that over peoples head like "well what are you going to do if you owe 5k to the doctors? Thats why you need THIS insurance" and thats when things get twisted around and manipulated and then presented to people that don't know any better than to question whats being force fed to you as the "best" option.
Discuss.
So heres the deal.
Cheapo individual rate insurace plan overview;
-5k deductible in network/10k out of network
-100% co-insurance after that
-$35/copay for visit in network, $50 for out of network
-$5/$15/$35 on prescriptions
Since plan covers 100% after deductible, no max out of pocket is applicable. Just pay the deductible and you are done. Plan costs $38.19/bi weekly and is offered as the cheap ass plan. All other coverages are identical between the two plans. Even Hospital visits, maternity coverage, wambulance rides and all. Everything. The differences in the two plans I want to talk about will be obvious with what I post. I have verified this as it is applicable to MY plan and will be using this information for the mathematic purposes of my post.
Premo plan individual rate plan overview;
-1k deductible in network/2k out of network
-80/20 co-insurance, you pay 20% after the deductible if in network. 60/40 out of network.
-$20 copay in network, $35 out of network
-$5/$10/$20 prescriptions
-10k max out of pocket in network(applicable to co-insurance) 20k out of network.
Plan cost is $139.08 bi-weekly. Keep in mind, all other details line by line are identical.
So, in my hypothetical-scenario-of-a-brain-thinking-way(I cannot help this, it is my curse), I started doing the math and thinking of some outcomes that made me think the cheaper insurance was actually better. There are some assumptions here, like assuming you actually ended up using medical providers in your network-just as an example.
So lets say you have 1 accident that costs 10k over the span of 1 year but you avoid going to the doctor for anything else. For mathematic purposes and ease of explaining, I'll keep the details simple.
In that year you would pay on the cheap-o plan;
-Your premiums($38.19*26 paychecks = $992.94)
-Your deductible(5k)
So $992.94 in premiums and 5k deductible or $5,992.94 total. If you were in an ambulance or had to go to the ER, the coverage is the same so the outcome would be the same either way. You may have to pay a co-pay for an initial visit, depending on the emergency. This difference would be less than $50 depending on what and where you were, so, I'll leave this cost out.
In the same year, if you had the prem-o plan you would pay;
-Your premiums($139.08*26 paychecks = $3,616.08)
-Your deductible(1k)
-20% of the bill or your portion of the co-insurance(10k bill - 1k deductible = 9k. 20% of 9k=$1800)
So, $3616.08 in premiums, 1k for the deductible and $1800 for the co-insurance or $6,416.08 total.
If you do the math, over and over and over, it seems like once you break the 8k benchmark, you actually end up better off with the cheap ass insurance.
Difference? Most of the money spent on the prem-o plan is in premiums. But, you might not need the insurance. You most likely won't have an accident that costs 10k or more, and if you do, hospitals and doctors are generally very flexible with taking payments. You are paying for the "coverage" either way with a premium plan, you only pay for it if you use it for the cheap ass plan.
So I guess I don't really get it. The devil is always hiding in the details, but I wonder just how often people are getting screwed around in stuff like this and they don't even know it.
The costs are similar, less than 15% in cost difference in the example I gave if something should actually happen. However, the premiums are 400% higher for the "better" plan and its entirely possible you won't even go to the doctor for anything serious this year. I mean, it could happen but if you do the math on a 25k or 50k hospital bill, the picture doesn't get any prettier with "premo" coverage.
Cost associated with 50k accident for either plan
Cheap ass plan
-$992.94 in premiums
-5k deductible
$5,992.94 total since you are 100% covered after 5k. No co-insurance on this plan because the deductible is "so high" as my HR person explained.
Premo plan
-$3,616.08 in premiums
-1k deductible
-20% co-insurance. 20% of 49k is $9,800, just under the out of pocket max. (I subtracted the 1k deductible that you pay 100% of)
So, $3,616.08 in premiums, 1k deductible and $9,800 in "shared costs" and you are looking at $14,416.08 that you owe over a 50k medical emergency with a "premo" plan.
Thoughts?
My thoughts are that the insurance plans are written to intimidate people into feeling like "OMG 5k deductibles what ever shall i do" and so they just instinctually sign up for the "more affordable, better inurance". Or so they think because of how it is presented to them. Insurance companies make money off of premiums, not claims. So, it sure seems like the appearance of the plan is supposed to be a better plan, but when you start doing the math it actually seems to be working against you to have "better" insurance. Its like they assume nobody has 5k to pay a bill, so they hold that over peoples head like "well what are you going to do if you owe 5k to the doctors? Thats why you need THIS insurance" and thats when things get twisted around and manipulated and then presented to people that don't know any better than to question whats being force fed to you as the "best" option.
Discuss.
Comment