I'm sick of all this "crew" shit...

[JDMcb7]

so this shit is getting out of hand. We have a fucking crew for EVERYTHING now. Well I have a solution to it. I am creating the ANTI-CREW CREW

It is the ultimate crew, and allows for no othAr!

[lowoctane]

well then imma be the Crew of the ANTI ANTI-CREW CREW.....HaKEkakekekhaha oh man

[chessboxer]

Re: I'm sick of all this "crew" shit...

Originally posted by JDMcb7
so this shit is getting out of hand. We have a fucking crew for EVERYTHING now. Well I have a solution to it. I am creating the ANTI-CREW CREW

It is the ultimate crew, and allows for no othAr!

saying that something is anti x presupposes that the variable x does exist, and the existence of the variable x must be for there the anti to work. Now, you claim that this anti crew allows for no other, however, if there are no others then there is nothing to be "anti" to.
also, the creation of a crew in opposition to the formation of crews is in and of itself and contradictory gesture. its like making an action movie that is opposed to action movies, and as we all know, last action hero sucked ass, and therefore, well, you get the drift here.






once again, im kidding everyone.
BDC BIATCH!!!

[JDMcb7]

Re: Re: I'm sick of all this "crew" shit...

Originally posted by chessboxer
saying that something is anti x presupposes that the variable x does exist, and the existence of the variable x must be for there the anti to work. Now, you claim that this anti crew allows for no other, however, if there are no others then there is nothing to be "anti" to.
also, the creation of a crew in opposition to the formation of crews is in and of itself and contradictory gesture. its like making an action movie that is opposed to action movies, and as we all know, last action hero sucked ass, and therefore, well, you get the drift here.






once again, im kidding everyone.
BDC BIATCH!!!

I'm to high to even try and understand that....

[onewisepunk]

Re: Re: I'm sick of all this "crew" shit...

Originally posted by chessboxer
saying that something is anti x presupposes that the variable x does exist, and the existence of the variable x must be for there the anti to work. Now, you claim that this anti crew allows for no other, however, if there are no others then there is nothing to be "anti" to.
also, the creation of a crew in opposition to the formation of crews is in and of itself and contradictory gesture. its like making an action movie that is opposed to action movies, and as we all know, last action hero sucked ass, and therefore, well, you get the drift here.

WoW thats heavy....

[lowoctane]

Re: Re: I'm sick of all this "crew" shit...

Originally posted by chessboxer
saying that something is anti x presupposes that the variable x does exist, and the existence of the variable x must be for there the anti to work. Now, you claim that this anti crew allows for no other, however, if there are no others then there is nothing to be "anti" to.
also, the creation of a crew in opposition to the formation of crews is in and of itself and contradictory gesture. its like making an action movie that is opposed to action movies, and as we all know, last action hero sucked ass, and therefore, well, you get the drift here.






once again, im kidding everyone.
BDC BIATCH!!!

so in his thesis, action x is not an etiquette affirmative action towards the opposition on line A and B therefore interrupt each other on therefore he cancels out the factor of being anti. So therefore anti is nor a correct affirmation of the word "anti" so he therefore exhibits all liability to his "anti" proposition and states his "anti" thesis anti to being an anti, so on the other hand sends a cancelation to "anti" proposals...so in conclusion "anti" is out of the books.








G.E.C! PWNS JU H@RDC0R3!!!!!!

[cp[mike]]

i love chessboxer

[Maple50175]

Another hate crime on your ass..

[ProjectCB7]

I never tried to make it ANYTHING like it is...lol

[chessboxer]

Re: Re: Re: I'm sick of all this "crew" shit...

Originally posted by lowoctane
so in his thesis, action x is not an etiquette affirmative action towards the opposition on line A and B therefore interrupt each other on therefore he cancels out the factor of being anti. So therefore anti is nor a correct affirmation of the word "anti" so he therefore exhibits all liability to his "anti" proposition and states his "anti" thesis anti to being an anti, so on the other hand sends a cancelation to "anti" proposals...so in conclusion "anti" is out of the books.








G.E.C! PWNS JU H@RDC0R3!!!!!!

im not sure if we agree or disagree, however, one cannot simplify something such as a crew as existing on a one dimensional thing such as a line, as expressed by you as being line A and B.


and i love you too cpmike!!!