Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ford Supercar Eh?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Ford Supercar Eh?

    Copied from another forum....

    Jeremy Clarkson: Sorry, Ford, I have to ask for my money back
    Thirty-five years ago I promised myself that one day I’d own a Ford GT40, the blue-collar supercar that took an axle grinder to Ferrari’s aristocratic halo at Le Mans. But 25 years ago my dreams were dashed as I grew too tall to fit inside.

    Happily, in 2002 Ford announced that it was to build a modern-day version of the old racer. It would, they said, cost less than £100,000 and do more than 200mph. They also said it would be much bigger than the original so pylon-people like me would be able to drive it.

    *
    And so, two years ago, having tested a prototype in America, I placed an order for one of the 28 that were coming to Britain.

    As the months groaned by there were rumours of big price increases, insatiable thirst and catastrophic suspension failure. But there were also rumours of the supercharged V8 pumping out 550bhp and a mountain of torque so massive it was breaking the testing equipment. So I didn’t mind.

    I didn’t even mind when it arrived at my house one month ago inside a truck which had “On Time” written down the side. As we know from America’s arrival into the second world war, their concept of “on time” differs slightly from ours.

    And anyway, it looked so gorgeous, a mass of bulging muscle struggling to contain that massive 5.4 litre supercharged heart. It doesn’t look like a GT40 but it looks like a GT40 looks in your head. And it’s huge. Longer than a Volvo XC90 and as wide as a Hummer.

    Which is why, on its first run, to London, it was like a blue and white Pied Piper trailing a stream of ratty hatches in its wake. Everyone was taking pictures, waving, giving me the thumb’s up. Never, not once in 15 years of road testing cars, had anything drawn such a massive crowd. And never had the crowd been so overtly supportive.

    Of course you can’t run a car like this without a few problems rearing their head from time to time. It’s too wide for the width restrictions on Hammersmith bridge — backing up earned me a slot on the traffic news that morning. The turning circle means every mini roundabout becomes a three-point turn, and at oblique junctions, as is the case in a Ferrari Enzo, you absolutely cannot see if anything’s coming.

    But set against this is a surprisingly quiet and civilised ride. It’s like a power station. Silent, as it gets on with the job of brightening up your life.

    Mind you, you are constantly aware of the Herculean power that nestles just over your right shoulder. Partly because you can see the supercharger belt whirring away in the rear-view mirror and partly because it makes a deep, dog-baiting rumble when you do put your foot down.

    Ford asked that I keep the revs below 4000 for the first thousand miles. But since 100mph equates to 1900rpm it’s not really a hardship. And at this speed you’re doing 15mpg, which isn’t bad at all. But three days later everything started to go very, very wrong.

    Leaving the Top Gear studio, the immobiliser refused to un-immobilise itself. So the car was pushed into the hangar and I went home instead in a rented Toyota Corolla.

    Ford sent a tow truck, changed the immobiliser and delivered the car to my house the following day. “Is it fixed?” I asked. “Yes,” they said.

    It wasn’t. At three in the morning the alarm blew. And then again at four. This meant my wife started to refer to it as “that f****** car”, which took away a bit of the sheen, if I’m honest.

    The next day, on the way back to the garage, I received a call on the hands-free phone from the tracker company. “Your car’s been stolen, sir,” said the man. “I’m sure it hasn’t,” I said, “because I’m in it.”

    Fearing that I might be the burglar, the man asked if I could give him my password. Tricky one that, since I have a different password for everything on the internet and can never remember any of them. And that’s a big problem, because the man at the end of the phone has the power to remotely shut down the engine.

    I threatened him, lightly, with some physical harm, but this didn’t work so I had to guess. “Aardvark,” I ventured. “Abacus, Aesop, additional . . .”

    *
    Eventually he took pity and I was able to deliver the car back to Ford with some stern warnings about the alarm, the immobiliser and the tracker system, all of which seemed to be malfunctioning. As a courtesy car they gave me a Ford Focus, with a diesel engine. Nice.

    Two days later the GT was back. “Is it fixed?” I asked, again. “Yes,” they said

    Five minutes out of the Ford garage I received a text to say my car had been stolen. And then, in the next half hour, three more. So, counting the two I’d received before I was even out of bed, that meant my car had been stolen five times before 9am.

    This time I rang Ford and explained that I would personally come over there and insert the whole car up the chairman’s backside if it wasn’t fixed. And while I was on the phone a yellow warning light came on the dash.

    “There’s a yellow warning light on the dash,” I bellowed, like Michael Winner, only angrier. “Oh, that’ll be something to do with the engine management system,” said the man with the bleeding ears. “You’ll need to get it looked at . . .”

    When Ford gave me the car back after its third hospital trip in as many weeks, I didn’t ask if the security system was fixed. Because the notion of it still being broken was simply inconceivable.

    So imagine my surprise when, one hour later, while at my daughter’s school play, I heard a familiar siren. I couldn’t believe it. The alarm had gone off again.

    In a fury this time, I called Ford and explained, loudly, that Roush, the company charged with servicing and maintaining the 28 GTs in Britain, was plainly incompetent. And that there was simply no point asking it to fix the alarm again because it’d had three goes already.

    I then did something the man at Ford wasn’t expecting. I asked for my money back.

    And that, the next day, is what happened.

    They put £126,000 in my account and sent a man to pick up the car. “Is it the alarm system?” he said. “They all do that.”

    So there we are. A 35-year dream. A two-year wait. Ten years of damn hard work. And what do I get? The most miserable month’s motoring it is possible to imagine.

    Strangely, however, as the GT rumbled down my drive for the last time, I felt like Julie Walters watching Michael Caine getting on the plane at the end of Educating Rita. I actually cried.

    *
    There’s a very good reason for this. I genuinely believe that some machines have a soul and I can’t bear to think of my Ford sitting in a warehouse now, unloved and unwanted. It is fine. It is perfect. It knows it’s a great, great car that was ruined by a useless ape who fitted a crummy aftermarket alarm system.

    Ford has said I can buy the car back any time. It has even lent me an Aston Martin DB9 while I make up my mind. I don’t know though. I just don’t know.

    Normally I finish these columns with an opinion of mine. But this time it’s the other way round. I’d love to hear yours.

    One thing: I know I could sell the car privately and make a £50,000 profit. But I have never profited from my position as a motoring journalist. And I never will.

    Vital statistics

    Model Ford GT
    Engine 5409cc V8 supercharged
    Power 550bhp @ 6500rpm
    Torque 500lb ft @ 3750rpm
    Transmission Six-speed manual
    Fuel 14.6mpg (combined cycle)
    CO2 N/A
    Acceleration 0-60mph: 3.8sec
    Top speed 212mph
    Price £126,000
    Verdict So good you can have mine
    Rating Five stars
    I knew this time would come, they were a pretty cool looking car, but it'll always be a Ford at heart.

    #2
    This came up on another board as well by a poster screaming Fords sucks!!!!!
    But the unbiased conclusion was that Clarkson really loved the car but couldn't believe Roush screwed it up with the crap aftermarket alarm system.

    Comment


      #3
      Yeah, its a great car.. it just shows how even with their supposed supercar.. they still cut corners everywhere they can, which is their major problem. If they would just stop half assing on stuff, their cars would be great.

      Comment


        #4
        tis still a piece of ford...

        Claire - '92 Mercedes-Benz 500E - AMG&Bilstein Treatment - The Wolf in Sheep's clothing.

        Alice - '97 BMW 540i6 - Dinan Tuned. - Low Profile Weekend Warrior.

        Felicia - '11 Ford Fusion - Luxury Package - Daily.. daily.. ugh.


        Originally posted by JoshM
        Okay to do: "I'm sorry I broke your mailbox, here's $100.
        NOT okay to do: "I'm sorry I fucked your sister, here's $100.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by fizzbob7
          look how many the low performance cb7 had......plenty......their machines with many working pieces.......

          didnt we just have like automatic seatblets and rear seat problems or something?

          Claire - '92 Mercedes-Benz 500E - AMG&Bilstein Treatment - The Wolf in Sheep's clothing.

          Alice - '97 BMW 540i6 - Dinan Tuned. - Low Profile Weekend Warrior.

          Felicia - '11 Ford Fusion - Luxury Package - Daily.. daily.. ugh.


          Originally posted by JoshM
          Okay to do: "I'm sorry I broke your mailbox, here's $100.
          NOT okay to do: "I'm sorry I fucked your sister, here's $100.

          Comment


            #6
            I heard something about the braking system on the GT, I think... there was a massive recall as soon as the car was released. I'll have to find the link...

            As far as CB7s and other lower priced cars, of course they'll have recalls, and plenty of them. Manufacturers take so many short cuts when it comes to the major mass produced cars. The GT is something different... it's a very limited production car, with a VERY high pricetag. Minor things maybe, but Ford should never have cheaped out on major things! That message to owners to "not drive the car under any circumstances" is a bit much for such an expensive car!

            Edit: it was a flaw in the casting process of the control arms...

            edit #2: http://www.blueovalnews.com/2005/adv...elt19feb05.htm
            Last edited by deevergote; 07-07-2005, 09:45 PM.






            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by deevergote
              I heard something about the braking system on the GT, I think... there was a massive recall as soon as the car was released. I'll have to find the link...

              Edit: it was a flaw in the casting process of the control arms...

              edit #2: http://www.blueovalnews.com/2005/adv...elt19feb05.htm

              yup... at least they told people, and did something about it unlike the Exploder.

              Comment


                #8
                Yeah, because the people that can afford a GT have a lot more power than people who drive Exploders... Not to mention, the problem with them was the tires (not Ford, exactly) and the whole thing was largely overdramatized. Only a few people actually got hurt or died as a result, and very few actually experienced the problems. Kinda like the scamming 'problem' we're having here on the board... (note: take a look at the overreactions, bandwagoneers, and resolved issues... I count 3 total problems that have yet to be fixed. I expect 2 of them to actually work out properly)






                Comment


                  #9
                  Ford finally came around and admitted that it was at fault...after the smoke had cleared, and nobody was paying attention. When they went to test the explorers to make them pass the tests or whatever, they were very unsafe. Ford's solution to this was to lower the PSI set on the tires which made it stable enough to not flip over.

                  So of course, you ride on tires for quite a while that are underinflated, they blow out or shred apart. Fords testing dudes finally admitted that they knew of the problem beforehand, but just pushed it aside, and messed with the tire pressures instead of dealing with the real problem at hand, the suspension.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by fizzbob7
                    wrong, the tires were NOT at fault....i personally dealt with over 40 instances of "tire recalls" and i promise you, the problem was with ford's alignment specs, the weight of the vehicle and the tires they chose......the tires themselves were FINE on every other car they were used on, and those were many......every tire was replaceable, but it came down to firestone's money vs ford's money.......firestone took the blame because ford promised to keep them around.....firestone was not to blame though, ford's stupidity was.......
                    Wow, I didn't know that. Seems like normal American big business politics...

                    SUVs and other trucks aren't subject to the same safety standards as cars. That scares me. I think they're just now starting to take the same care, since so many people drive them. Trucks used to be for construction workers and off-roaders... not soccer moms and doctor's wives.






                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by deevergote
                      That scares me. I think they're just now starting to take the same care, since so many people drive them. Trucks used to be for construction workers and off-roaders... not soccer moms and doctor's wives.
                      Yup... but thats why I LOVE seeing the prices of gas going up... get to see the people driving around in those heaps of crap, and you literally see the money flying out the window.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Yeah, one of the biggest complaints abut the H2 (official complaints, not just bitching, but actually calling the dealerships and corporate offices) is the gas consumption. What do those idiots think move that heap?

                        Give me a car powered by farts... beans are cheap.






                        Comment


                          #13
                          Yeah, another car that annoys me are the new chevy trucks. Ever notice that you hardly ever see one with 2 DRL lights working. I keep trying to see if its the same one that blows out, or if its random. Just another little thing that annoys the hell outta me, but shows that they obviously skipped that little thing to save some money. If your gonna put it on there, please make it work!

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X