Wing and Carnards

[Dnice11]

Ive seen a couple cb's on here with the Wings West Thruster wing and i like the look and seriously considering gettin one, do they make them specifically for our cb's or do they come off another car?

And i want carnards(just for the looks) i dont want holes in my front bumper is it another way to install em? I heard strong double sided tape but IDK

[Dnice11]

thanks for the input, and i love the look its the same look im going for only i want them on the stock ex bumper.

[oneoffaccord]

heres mine..with stock bumpers but they are bolted to the bumper

[Dnice11]

thats just want i want that is pure sexy

[19TcappaLX]

thats a nice touch,don't see that alot.

[ikayto]

but one of you built their car after the other one did *whistles.

[oneoffaccord]

but one of you built their car after the other one did *whistles.

very very true..i must say..

[Professor]

too each there own...if you search you can find different kinds of those..

[owequitit]

Canards can't be properly implemented without the use of a wind tunnel. Period.

Creating drag is not the same as creating downforce.

[ikayto]

^^ trial and error is a good substitute for the wind tunnel.

the sportscarmotion civic experiments constantly by adjusting its aero after track uses.

I mean, I know it's meant for a function but a lot of people do things just for looks.

[owequitit]

^^ trial and error is a good substitute for the wind tunnel.

the sportscarmotion civic experiments constantly by adjusting its aero after track uses.

I mean, I know it's meant for a function but a lot of people do things just for looks.

For looks, it doesn't matter. However, unless you have some way to measure direct results (lap times count) then you can't do it. It is as simple as that. Also, as the aerospace industry has already learned, the wind tunnel is much more effective than trial and error. Even the Wright brothers determined working components in a wind tunnel, that they had to design and build (because there weren't any) because they knew that it could take forever to stumble on the perfect solution. Unfortunately, even trial and error isn't very scientific.

[coletrain]

For looks, it doesn't matter. However, unless you have some way to measure direct results (lap times count) then you can't do it. It is as simple as that. Also, as the aerospace industry has already learned, the wind tunnel is much more effective than trial and error. Even the Wright brothers determined working components in a wind tunnel, that they had to design and build (because there weren't any) because they knew that it could take forever to stumble on the perfect solution. Unfortunately, even trial and error isn't very scientific.

[ikayto]

Unfortunately, even trial and error isn't very scientific.

I thought that was the whole point of science and experiments.

lol

Just joking, I understand what you state, you want something quantitative; track times would count but arent sure fire, but better than nothing.

[owequitit]

[90HONDAINSPIRE]

i duno bout the canards on cb but if you like than rock it