Activists protest bonuses at AIG executives' homes

[npor]

I just love making these threads.

Dozens of activists visit AIG executives' homes to protest bonuses from federal funds

FAIRFIELD, Conn. (AP) -- A busload of activists -- outnumbered 2-to-1 by reporters and photographers -- are paying visits to the homes of American International Group Inc. executives in Connecticut to protest tens of millions in bonuses awarded by the company.

About 40 protesters parked at a cul-de-sac Saturday afternoon and walked to the Fairfield home of Douglas Polling. They were met on the curb by two security guards, and one activist read a letter detailing the financial struggles that many Connecticut residents have faced. The group then left the note in Polling's mailbox.

Polling already agreed to forfeit his bonus, but the protesters want AIG executives to do more to help working families.

Okay. The last line is what gets me the most. This guy is straight forward giving up his bonus. No, he ALREADY agreed to give up his bonus, before the people went to his house. So, they're technically mad at him for giving the money back?


What I don't understand, is this. He gave up the bonus money, giving it back. But...that fixes nothing....the people want him to do more? What the fuck else is he supposed to do, pay their bills out of his pocket? Just because all the AIG exec's are in the hole, people are thinking "oh well they're scared, lets get as much as we can out of them"

Thoughts on the last line of quote?

[bobbycos]

what they are mad about is how AIG got $170 billion in TARP money and still managed to pay out bonuses to people i the financial products division which is the division that screwed things up for AIG. In addition to Polling, 11 people got bonuses who no longer worked at the company. There is so much more but I'm tired and its 1:15 am

[lokuputha]

"Polling already agreed to forfeit his bonus, but the protesters want AIG executives to do more to help working families. "

Mob mentality usually doesn't involve rational thought, just hype and more hype....and then some burning cars.

I do agree that protesting is however a very visual way to show distrust and displeasure towards the AIG's of the world...will it work...ehh...there will be another Obama and then everyone will calm down.

[Flatline]

I don't think bonuses should be given to someone when the money you are giving them isn't yours.

Or they don't even work for you. Why do they need another few hundred thousand?

I agree, people are trying to yank that mile right out of their ass after he gave one back already.
But when are these companies going to become responsible and start acting like grown up companies rather than child companies.

[Coco]

I think what those people are doing is great. So what if he gave his bonus back? If there wasnt such an uproar about the bonuses you think he wouldve gave it back? No.

Its good that people are doing this, shows that were not going to sit back and watch these greedy fucks take our money.

[JohnD1079]

Theres more to the story...

http://www.cnbc.com/id/29812375

A busload of activists representing working- and middle-class families paid visits Saturday to the lavish homes of American International Group executives to protest the tens of millions of dollars in bonuses awarded by the struggling insurance company after it received a massive federal bailout.

Aig Headquarters

About 40 protesters sought to urge AIG executives who received a portion of the $165 million in bonuses to do more to help families.

"We think $165 million could be used in a more appropriate way to keep people in their homes, create more jobs and health care," said Emeline Bravo-Blackport, a gardener.

She marveled at AIG [AIG 1.26 -0.36 (-22.22%) ] executive James Haas' colonial house, which has stunning views of a golf course and the Long Island Sound. The Fairfield house is "another part of the world" from her life in nearby Bridgeport, which flirted with bankruptcy in the 1990s and still struggles with foreclosures and unemployment."

"Lord, I wonder what it's like to live in a house that size," she said.

Another protester, Claire Jeffery, of Bloomfield, said she's on the verge of foreclosure. She works as a housekeeper; her husband, a truck driver, can't find work.

"I love my home," she said. "I really want people to help us."

News of the bonuses last week ignited a firestorm of controversy and even death threats against AIG employees. The company, which is based in New York, has received $182.5 billion in federal aid and now is about 80 percent government-owned, while the national housing and job markets have collapsed as the country spirals into a crippling recession.

American International Group Inc. has said it was contractually obligated to give the retention bonuses, payments designed to keep valued employees from quitting, to people in its financial products unit, based in Wilton, Conn. Congress began action on a bill that would tax 90 percent of the bonuses, and the company's chief executive urged anyone who received more than $100,000 to return at least half.

AIG has argued that retention bonuses are crucial to pulling the company out of its crisis. Without the bonuses, the company says, top employees who best understand AIG's business would leave.

The company, in response to the protests, said all its employees were "working very hard to pay back the government and help the U.S.

"The people working at AIG today are part of the solution, not part of the problem," company spokeswoman Christina Pretto said in an e-mailed statement.

Besides Haas' home, protesters on Saturday also visited the Fairfield home of AIG executive Douglas Poling. They were met both times by security guards. They left letters that acknowledged some executives, including Haas and Poling, are giving up the money but that asked them to support higher taxes on families earning more than $500,000 a year.

"You have a wonderful opportunity to help your neighbors in Connecticut," the letters said. "We ask you to consider the experiences of families struggling in this economy."

Also on CNBC.com

* Slideshow: Origins of the Financial Crisis
* Payback Time! Play 'Layoffs' the Video Game
* It's Good to Be Oracle's Larry Ellison

Afterward, the group protested at the office of AIG's financial products division in Wilton, where they waved signs and chanted, "Money for the needy, not for the greedy!"

There were no arrests.

Mary Huguley, of Hartford, said AIG executives should share their wealth with people like her sister, who is facing foreclosure.

"You ought to share it, and God will bless you for doing it," she said.

The protests came amid new questions about the retention bonuses. State Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said Saturday that documents turned over to his office by AIG appeared to show that the company paid $53 million more in bonuses to its financial products division than previously reported.

AIG said Blumenthal was wrong. It said the payments to which he referred had been made months ago and had been disclosed to the U.S Department of the Treasury.

The attorney general of Connecticut said Saturday that he is asking American International Group why documents appear to show the company paid $53 million more in bonuses to its financial products division than previously reported.

Documents turned over late Friday show AIG paid $218 million in bonuses last weekend, higher than the $165 million that was previously disclosed, said the office of Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, who had issued a subpoena.

Bonuses were "showered like confetti" on AIG employees, Blumenthal said.

AIG had previously disclosed that the company was contractually obligated to pay a total of about $165 million of previously awarded "retention pay" to employees in the financial products unit, based in Connecticut, by March 15. It said another $55 million in retention pay had already been distributed to about 400 AIG Financial Products employees.

That total of $220 million is about $2 million more than the figure disclosed Friday, and Blumenthal said he was seeking clarification from the company on whether the new papers differ from what was previously reported.

"Unless the number can be explained, it will undercut any lingering rationale the company may have for these unjustified payments," Blumenthal told The Associated Press on Saturday.

AIG spokesman Mark Herr declined to comment.

The newly released documents show that the nation's largest insurer, which has received $182.5 billion in federal money to keep it from failing, paid bonuses of more than $1 million to 73 employees, with five of them getting bonuses more than $4 million, Blumenthal said.

The company did not release the names of the employees, citing worker safety.

"The initial number was so outrageous that it will further fuel the justified anger and revulsion that people feel," Blumenthal said. "It simply shows how these people should been shoved out the door, not showered with cash."

News of the bonuses last week ignited a firestorm, and even some death threats. Congress began action on a bill that would tax 90 percent of the bonuses, and the company's chief executive urged anyone who received more than $100,000 to return at least half.

A busload of activists--outnumbered 2-to-1 by reporters and photographers--are paying visits to the homes of AIG executives in Connecticut to protest tens of millions in bonuses awarded by the company.

About 40 protesters parked at a cul-de-sac Saturday afternoon and walked to the Fairfield home of Douglas Polling. They were met on the curb by two security guards, and one activist read a letter detailing the financial struggles that many Connecticut residents have faced. The group then left the note in Polling's mailbox.

Polling already agreed to forfeit his bonus, but the protesters want AIG executives to do more to help working families.

AIG has received more than $182 billion in federal aid.