Let me start by saying I, unlike most other liberal-minded people, was at one point actually considering supporting further offshore drilling for oil.
We are too dependent on other countries for our oil which, let's be honest, we NEED in order to continue being a successful nation (at least for now). I had appreciated the notion that gathering the crude from our own territories could at least put a damper on the "control" these foreign countries think they have on us.
I guess it takes a disaster to knock the sense back in to a person.
After this horrible oil spill/leak/whateveryouwannacallit, I'm very against any further drilling for oil, especially on the ocean floor.
So, my main question is, are the "Drill Baby Drill"-ers still gung-ho on off-shore drilling? Or does hard, devastating evidence actually work to control their views?
We are too dependent on other countries for our oil which, let's be honest, we NEED in order to continue being a successful nation (at least for now). I had appreciated the notion that gathering the crude from our own territories could at least put a damper on the "control" these foreign countries think they have on us.
I guess it takes a disaster to knock the sense back in to a person.
After this horrible oil spill/leak/whateveryouwannacallit, I'm very against any further drilling for oil, especially on the ocean floor.
So, my main question is, are the "Drill Baby Drill"-ers still gung-ho on off-shore drilling? Or does hard, devastating evidence actually work to control their views?
Comment