Dyno tuned today

[straightedge]

Here's the initial word. I had to work so my tuner took my car. Tuned on 9psi, stock F22A6 block, see member's ride for specs.

Heatsoaked after tuning put me at 270 whp and right around 240 wtq. Dyno wasn't reading torque values, and those numbers are corrected.

Here is the best torque curve i can do. The signal held halfway decent through this one. I still go by rpm because where the signal fades out it will just show a break in the graph so where it gets pretty off in the real high rpms there is just no torque curve at all on the engine speed graph.

[Accord R33]

WOW! huge numbers for 9psi.

Graphs? cant post a dyno thread without a graph!

[NAiL05]

Setup would be nice too.

[bresk8r87]

i think hes on a big 16g and f22 stock block?

[Maple50175]

Setup would be nice too.

see member's ride for specs.

[straightedge]

Thanks Maple. Yes, see the member's ride, it's 100% accurate.

No graphs yet, my tuner [good friend, Matt] has them on his laptop and is out tuning another car. I'll try and attach them later.

The dyno wouldn't get a torque signal, so he was estimating based on the dyno when he told me 240ish wtq. Either way, I knew this thing was a monster, but damn! With a better intercooler that didn't heatsoak so bad, 280 would be a breeze.

[Ilikebigbutts]

so what turbo are you running?

ILBB

[h22sparkle]

Its not that straightedge the fact is even though your getting heatsoak and 9psi its just getting cooler so that setup of your is gettin a little better due to weather change more cooler air with the good mixture of fuel and tuning surely will yield better numbers.

[straightedge]

ILBB: It says EVOIII Big 16g on my member's ride thread.

[straightedge]

I understand changes in weather. That's why a heatsoaked intercooler will not produce as much power as either A. a more efficient cooler or B. an initial pull.

The first pull the car took of the day netted 273whp, after tuning and heatsoak you can see it went down. I'm not mad for these reasons 1. The power is THERE, easily. and 2. It is now tuned more RELIABLY than just a street tune relying on a butt dyno. I DD this car, it can't be quirky and so far, my tuner is the best I've ever seen and I'm extremely happy with all he's accomplishing.

Either way, 270whp on a stock block SOHC is nuts and I'm still a tad bit shocked.

[h22sparkle]

I understand changes in weather. That's why a heatsoaked intercooler will not produce as much power as either A. a more efficient cooler or B. an initial pull.

The first pull the car took of the day netted 273whp, after tuning and heatsoak you can see it went down. I'm not mad for these reasons 1. The power is THERE, easily. and 2. It is now tuned more RELIABLY than just a street tune relying on a butt dyno. I DD this car, it can't be quirky and so far, my tuner is the best I've ever seen and I'm extremely happy with all he's accomplishing.

Either way, 270whp on a stock block SOHC is nuts and I'm still a tad bit shocked.

hey it happens but not so often you have a decent motor take care of it

[maroonaccord2.2]

Nice numbers on the Dyno, I'm on my way to check out your ride thread now.

[d112crzy]

wow, im DEF. impressed with those numbers.

which dyno was it tho? (dyno jet, mustang dyno, dyna pack...?)

[backyardspecial]

well loook at my dyno that was on a hot ass day in LA i made 266.6 over heating on the dyno

[straightedge]

Why do I need to look at your dyno?

I'll post my graph later.