ef upper control arms

[tm123]

Just put a set of EF upper control arms
highly reccomend this for people who are lowerd
the upper ball joint wont bang the frame
gives you a smoother ride
only bad thing is that it gives you slightly more camber
but two thumbs up on whoever figured this mod out

[vietkid_2006]

I might have to look into getting some

[F20A CB7]

Didn't some1 try eg upper ball joints or ek, I no civic ball joints has been done b4 on the forum.



But for you

[C91BLX7]

I have oem arms and they don't hit.
I guess i'm lucky or not low enough. lol

[mndude07]

OEM arms only hit with a camber kit installed.

[phantomcb7]

I have oem arms and they don't hit.
I guess i'm lucky or not low enough. lol

OEM arms only hit with a camber kit installed.

to first poster u prolly either arent low enough or dont have a camber kit the ball joint camber kit is the one that causes it to hit

[mndude07]

to first poster u prolly either arent low enough or dont have a camber kit the ball joint camber kit is the one that causes it to hit

I think you have it backwards. The balljoint kit causes it to not hit. The eccentric bolts, like ingall's are what make it hit. Those push the entire arm our further, which is why it hits. Maybe it hits with both kits.

[oneoffaccord]

Just put a set of EF upper control arms
highly reccomend this for people who are lowerd
the upper ball joint wont bang the frame
gives you a smoother ride
only bad thing is that it gives you slightly more camber
but two thumbs up on whoever figured this mod out

the only good thing about this is that they dont bang everything else about the mod is horrible. you said it yourself it give you slightly more camber. something that you really dont need. this is how i crashed my car. too much negative camber. good luck

[19dabeast85]

Yeah, I don't understand why people want shorter UCA's when the stock ones will never hit unless they have a camber kit installed......so why not leave the stock non-adjustable UCA's in with negative camber instead of install EF UCA's with a camber kit that still have negative camber?? I'm just trying to understand the purpose.

The SPC low profile ball joint kits are great....they have the best camber correction with least potential to hit of any kit available. That's what I have and I don't have any issues with 94-95 H&R sports (~2.1") and -0.9 camber.

Thumbs up for trying something different but just don't see the need.

[tm123]

idk im not using a camber kit...
only reason i have them is cuz my car is super slammed and bangs the upper frame
im not sure if i want a cambe kit or not

[quaidum]

I think you have it backwards. The balljoint kit causes it to not hit. The eccentric bolts, like ingall's are what make it hit. Those push the entire arm our further, which is why it hits. Maybe it hits with both kits.

my tas adjustable upper control arms hit when i have the camber at 0 degrees but when it is at -1 degree it will not

[Rayz92]

nice mod... if they fit then in theory skunk2 adjustable control arms should fit too right? Then that would fix the camber?
While they are more expensive than just buying SPC or ingalls camber kit you wouldn't have to worry about removing the ball joint and messing up the structural rigidity of the oem uca, and it's about half the price of the TAS adjutable uca. idk just a thought.

[oneoffaccord]

im not going to say anything else. but let the pictures do the talking.

[oneoffaccord]

[ofr]

Does it hit with the s2 uca? ive been looking at those for a while just wasnt sure about the amount of camber correction and if it would hit after putting the camber all the way positive.