Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Saab 9-7x Aero vs. Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Saab 9-7x Aero vs. Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8

    I spotted both of these the other day. I've always liked them, for various reasons... and I thought it would be cool to compare, discuss, and hear what other people think about them.

    I picked these two specifically for a few reasons:
    1) They can both be found used for a reasonable price (under $20k... sometimes well under)
    2) They are both essentially American products, meaning they're a little cheaper to repair and maintain
    3) Both offer impressive power
    and
    4) Both are essentially luxury SUVs ("essentially" because that can be rather subjective... but both are generally considered to be such in the market.)

    I don't want to get into other stuff, like BMW, Audi, or Mercedes-Benz... because those things are in a different realm in terms of price and cost of ownership. Especially if you're talking about the performance models!


    Anyway, here are the trucks:

    Saab 9-7x Aero

    Yes, it's basically a Chevy Trailblazer SS. In fact, it's MOSTLY a Trailblazer SS. They are all AWD, however... and apparently it's a better system than the AWD found in the Trailblazer (which I believe was only optional, not standard on that truck.) It packs the same 390hp LS2 V8 as the Trailblazer SS. It also has a bit of Saab luxury on the inside, even if the outside still looks like a Chevy. The Saab scoots to 60 in about 5.5 seconds, and weighs about 4800lbs.

    Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8

    Sharing a platform with the Mercedes-Benz M-Class, the Jeep has a competent and well-made chassis. Add in Chrysler's 475hp Hemi, and it's a monster! Like the Saab, it also has AWD. It'll hit 60 in 4.5 seconds, despite weighing nearly 500lbs more than the Saab.


    The Jeep is clearly the top performer, and probably wins in terms of style as well. The Saab offers two major benefits, however: purchase prices dip low... $10,000 for a higher-mileage model. The Saab is older, and the brand is defunct, making them far less desirable. However, since they're mostly Chevy, parts are readily available! The SRT8 seems to sell just BARELY under $20,000 for an inexpensive one. Even though it's an american-branded vehicle (unlike the Saab), many parts on it are likely foreign parts (again, unlike the Saab.) The hemi isn't a cheap engine to fix when it breaks, I've heard.


    Anyway, this initially stated as a simple comparison of two cool trucks. Oddly, I find myself defending the weirdo Saab against the seemingly-superior Jeep! I'm not looking to buy either one of these. This is just for entertainment (and to give my brain a break from my schoolwork for a few minutes.)

    Any input is welcome. I'm curious to hear what others think. Especially if anyone has had experience with either vehicle!







    #2
    This isn't really a far comparison for me. There's a reason that Saab is defunct. Because selling cheaply-made vehicles and only adding afterthought treatments to make it look nicer is akin to polishing a turd. The inside of the Saab makes you feel like you're inside a Trailblazer. People don't want to pay top dollar for that, so their prices have plummeted. That late 90s, early 00s GM feel is vomit-inducing and a Ford Taurus SES has more character.

    The Jeep on the other hand is gorgeous and arguably built much better. The model that succeeded this one has even won awards for the interior. Granted that was the Overlander trim level, but still, it shows that the brand pays attention to interior aesthetics. The performance is better, the resale 10 years from now will be MUCH better, the quality is better and it has better components that have gone into it (i.e. massive Brembo brakes).
    My Members' Ride Thread - It's a marathon build, not a sprint. But keep me honest on the update frequency!

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Jarrett View Post
      This isn't really a far comparison for me. There's a reason that Saab is defunct. Because selling cheaply-made vehicles and only adding afterthought treatments to make it look nicer is akin to polishing a turd. The inside of the Saab makes you feel like you're inside a Trailblazer. People don't want to pay top dollar for that, so their prices have plummeted. That late 90s, early 00s GM feel is vomit-inducing and a Ford Taurus SES has more character.

      The Jeep on the other hand is gorgeous and arguably built much better. The model that succeeded this one has even won awards for the interior. Granted that was the Overlander trim level, but still, it shows that the brand pays attention to interior aesthetics. The performance is better, the resale 10 years from now will be MUCH better, the quality is better and it has better components that have gone into it (i.e. massive Brembo brakes).
      I'll give you resale value compared to the Chevy, but I have little confidence that the Chrysler is built any better than the GM. GM smallblock V8s are a dime a dozen and are the preferred swap for a reason. Fit and finish, sure, actual quality, I'm not so sure.

      My co-worker is a die hard Saab nut and has had many 99/900's and currently owns the last of the 9-3s. He really disliked GM's influence on the car and said the reliability took a nosedive compared to the 100% Saab vehicles.

      Comment


        #4
        I think the only Saab I would own would be a 2006 9-2x Aero with an EJ255. Even then, I feel nearly the exact same way when sitting inside those. They tried to spruce up the interior of the car they were making over by changing the color of something, or putting some leather on a doo-dad. It doesn't really come across as a higher-end version of the base car, but something out of place. But as with the 9-7x Aero, that's not really owning a Saab
        .
        My Members' Ride Thread - It's a marathon build, not a sprint. But keep me honest on the update frequency!

        Comment


          #5
          I still love the 9-3 Aeros.

          I remember when they came out, ordering a brochure just so I could bask in their beautiful design.

          At that point, not sure who was making them. I think those were still Saab but I did not follow them enough to know for sure.

          Jeep is cool. I agree, resale will be better if for no other reason than the fact that Saab is over.

          Comment


            #6
            So I checked-

            I believe I liked the 06 model year-



            Id still pick one up today to beat on. They're quite sharp imo.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Jarrett View Post
              I think the only Saab I would own would be a 2006 9-2x Aero with an EJ255. Even then, I feel nearly the exact same way when sitting inside those. They tried to spruce up the interior of the car they were making over by changing the color of something, or putting some leather on a doo-dad. It doesn't really come across as a higher-end version of the base car, but something out of place. But as with the 9-7x Aero, that's not really owning a Saab
              .
              The 9-2x aero is known as a Saabaru.

              It's the furthest thing from a Saab. If you look at it for what it is, then it's a nice car. Don't expect much from a Subaru with some crap thrown onto it. It's basically the FRS before the FRS.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Jarrett View Post
                This isn't really a far comparison for me. There's a reason that Saab is defunct. Because selling cheaply-made vehicles and only adding afterthought treatments to make it look nicer is akin to polishing a turd. The inside of the Saab makes you feel like you're inside a Trailblazer. People don't want to pay top dollar for that, so their prices have plummeted. That late 90s, early 00s GM feel is vomit-inducing and a Ford Taurus SES has more character.

                The Jeep on the other hand is gorgeous and arguably built much better. The model that succeeded this one has even won awards for the interior. Granted that was the Overlander trim level, but still, it shows that the brand pays attention to interior aesthetics. The performance is better, the resale 10 years from now will be MUCH better, the quality is better and it has better components that have gone into it (i.e. massive Brembo brakes).
                The Jeep with less chrome would be perfect.

                If the Saab has an LS2, that means it has a huuuuuuuuge aftermarket. Should be pretty easy to make gobs of power in a lil ole Saab.

                Also, the Saabaru is a WRX, not FRS/BRZ.

                YouTube Clicky!!

                Comment


                  #9
                  That Saab would be fun, but the Jeep looks 100% better. The Hemi in those cars have a serious problem with valve seating. When the problem happens, it kills the engine completely. The valve will beat against the piston, and the hemisphere part of the head making it look like a jagged golf ball sort of. We're swapping one at school with this problem. The head and cylinder were damaged beyond repair, and the used long block was 3200 bucks.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    The LS2's aftermarket is a big part of why I'm willing to put these two trucks up against each other. The Jeep makes WAY more power, and is definitely the faster vehicle in stock form... but the LS2 can be upgraded quite easily (I know this because I have one in my CTS-V Though mine remains stock.) The Trollblazer, I mean 9-7x Aero, can be purchased for 2/3 to 1/2 the cost of the Jeep, and a few thousand dollars would make it faster.

                    Supposedly the Hemis are extremely expensive to modify. I didn't know they were problematic. That sucks!

                    I definitely agree that the Jeep is the better looking of the two, though. At least one good thing about the 9-7x being a Saab in pretty much name only is that parts would likely be MUCH cheaper than if it were a legitimate European car.






                    Comment


                      #11
                      Man, you can get LS parts at Kroger.. It's just trim stuff that'd be a pain to get. An LS would be easier to work on too.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        I'd agree... if I could get the damn sparkplugs out of my own LS2! (seriously... I'm going to have to pay to have it done... my ego hurts just thinking about it!)






                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by deevergote View Post
                          I'd agree... if I could get the damn sparkplugs out of my own LS2! (seriously... I'm going to have to pay to have it done... my ego hurts just thinking about it!)
                          Its really not that hard. Replaced quite a few on LS motors.

                          It really helps to have one of these


                          I know someone who owns one of those Jeeps. He sold his GS430 to buy that thing and completely regrets it (actually looking to sell it now). That car doesn't do one thing good (at least that's what he told me). I'd stick with Chevy over Dodge anyways.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Honestly I don't like the 9-7x (although I do love my 06 saab 9-3 v6) because just like you said all it is a trailblazer. To be honest the trailblazer ss looks way better then Saab anyways, the jeep on the other hand would be nice but like everyone else stated the ls2 is cheap and easy to upgrade. Hell you can buy a procharger second hand (1500 - 2000 dollars) and make damn near 500whp. Had an uncle that did it to the iron block 6.0.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Very true (man, I shouldn't let that idea tempt me for my CTS-V... ) A $12,000 Trollblazer with a $2000 Procharger would destroy a Jeep SRT8 on a drag strip. $14,000 is still a good deal less than the $19,000 or so that I've seen SRT8s selling for.
                              That is, as long as the transmission can hold the power.






                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X