Originally posted by cp[mike]
I am going to measure the length of the axles installed and see what I have there too.
Your measurement is close, but not quite dead on.
Once the modification is complete, the two holes will actually be siamesed a little bit.

The original hole is approximately located by the green circle, and the blue one would indicate the Prelude hole obviously.
Haveing the spacers on or off didn't seem to make much of a difference, and this was as measured with the engine in the car.
There is probably some adjustment in the mounts, but this is pretty much where it wants to sit.
Now here is my current issue with the no weld method.
Once that hole is siamesed, a lot of the bracket structure that the bolt relies on for support is gone. The same goes for the back side. In the end, I will probably end up with 2 steel plates, one welded over each siamesed hole, with the correct hole drilled through them. So now we have involved some welding, which sort of defeats the purpose. Although, admittedly, those two plates require less welding and less structural strength.
I will make a final decision when I am done.
The pluses of the no weld method are as follows.
1)The Prelude mount is beefier by virtue of the fact it was designed for the torque. And it is beefy! It was pushing the other 3 mounts much more than they were pushing it.
2)Geometrically from a support stand point, it makes more sense to me because the mount is located closer to the centerline of the tranny, which probably reduces torque forces on the mount slightly. The fact that it is taller overall may negate this somewhat though. I wouldn't know without doing math, and that isn't important, because there is more than enough
strength both ways.
3) When used in conjunction with the spacers on the driver's side, the axles should be a little more parallel with the ground. This can aid torque steer, at the minor cost of ground clearance. The header should still tuck up above the cross bar though. I roughly measured the angle of the axles before I pulled the engine, so we wills see what happens when I put it back on the ground.
All in all, it is a tossup at this point. I will reserve judgement until it is done, but both methods are probably a wash. If you have all of the Accord 5 speed stuff, then it is probably wise to replace the bracket.
I didn't have the mounts and was having a hard time find the brackets etc. So I decided to investigate this further. Our conversation a long time ago made me wonder again, so here we are.
Interestingly, like I said, it wasn't until I got the tape out that we found the slight difference, and it doesn't seem to be enough to break things. In fact the difference is less than what you would experience with a broken dogbone mount.
Will you do me a favor and take a picture of your engine from the driver's side shock tower, looking down?
I am basically trying to see how much room you have between the valve cover and the shock tower. I am pretty sure i am sitting in the right spot though.
Thanks!
If I could work on it more than just a little bit on the weekends, it would have been done by now!
It is driving me crazy! I want to drive it so bad.



the OEM hole is far enough forward on the bracket that the hole can still be moved toward the frame and up a little bit and the mount still clears the framrail side of the bracket with ease.
5th gen conversion.


Comment