Originally posted by DCB7
View Post
Yeah man we are basically beating a dead horse at this point. Look at the number of people on food stamps before Obama, then after. Food stamps vs welfare is different too. Compare the big picture if you will, rather than one specific program that supports your claims.
Lets not forget the number of people that equate to 36% vs the number of people that equate to 22% of the total fund. Think about how many people(white vs black or whatever) there actually are.
Yes, social seurity supports a large portion of AA communities, and the statistics of poverty of people not getting SSI that live in poverty is outrageous. As I had previously mentioned, the 12 year old article was outdated, and the current standing of poverty numbers with and without SSI is staggering. It is becoming clear that the fund IS supporting the demographic.
No hard feelings intended, the facts are just the facts.
Why do you suppose that is? I mean, i feel like you disagree with my explanation so I am curious what is your own?
Non confrontational approach here, educate me on your opinion. I have expressed my own, even though it is controversial, I think I have explained it thoroughly enough that common sense understands 99% of what I am saying.
Lets hear your opinion on why so many AA's are living in poverty, and why so many of them rely on our system.
Hows about we agree to keep it non-confrontational, and maybe others will partake in our conversation too?
Please though, if you are going to "let me have it" then have some hard factual stuff that supports your case.
If you just want to drop an opinion, do that too. Just, please, dont be a giant douche with nothing to support what you are saying.
Just like I was saying earlier, if 228 million people are responsible for 36%(your numbers now) of the fund, and 44 million people are responsible for 22%(again, your numbers) of the fund, obviously less of the 228 million people are getting help compared to the 44 million.
Using your numbers, the same pattern still follows.
If the fund was 1 billion dollars, 36% would be 360 million dollars or $360,000,000/228,000,000 white people = $1.57 per person on average. 22% of 1 billion would be $220,000,000 or 220,000,000/44,000,000 AA people = $5 per person on average.
So yeah, AA demographic still is drawing money 3+ times faster faster than whites. 3x$1.57 = $4.71 per person. So yeah, more than 3x faster.
Why do you suppose that is?
And with a black president in office, please don't come back trying to argue about no opportunity, that the white people control shit, or anything that maybe offensive. There is no longer an excuse like that that is valid, now that the commander and chief is AA-obviously, AA people can do anything they put their minds too.
So, explain please why this is the way it is?

I don't know about these things.

.. Nice to see the CB7T represent ..


) Plus i dont think I have any intellectual self pleasuring left in me for a while so I'm done.
Comment